Peter sez: > Kerberos is well-designed AND secure? WRONG in detail, but BETTER THAN > LOTS OF OTHER STUFF. P. I agree it's a bit clunky, but do you think any insecurities come from the algorithm being public knowlege? Seems more like implementation goofs (e.g. the recent telnet problem) [ I guess this discussion is pretty off topic, but its the only traffic this list has seen in a while! ] -Rens