Re: Introduction

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Christopher Klaus: "PC Week Article on Network Security Scanners"
• Previous message: Dan Stromberg: "Re: Suggestions, please"
• Maybe in reply to: IDS Moderator: "Introduction"
• Next in thread: Peter da Silva: "Re: Introduction"

Anthony C. Zboralski wrote:
 
> On Wed, 31 Jan 1996, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> 
> [...]
> > Solaris 2.5 is significantly more secure.  Perhaps of exceptional
> 
> That's what you may believe, i don't know your sources of informations,
> maybe you should think twice before making an affirmation or some naive
> people are gonna take what you say as granted..

I'm almost ashamed to say, I'd really rather enjoy pointing out just how
wrong net.groupthink has been on this particular issue...

Care to substantiate the above claim?   Actually, my conscience might
feel a bit clearer afterward, if you were to simply skim
http://www.oac.uci.edu/~strombrg/why-solaris.html, and call it a day...

• Next message: Christopher Klaus: "PC Week Article on Network Security Scanners"
• Previous message: Dan Stromberg: "Re: Suggestions, please"
• Maybe in reply to: IDS Moderator: "Introduction"
• Next in thread: Peter da Silva: "Re: Introduction"